Home-Account Blog

Posts Tagged ‘refinance’

Making Home Affordable Program Doesn’t — At Least Not Yet

April 15th, 2009

recoverylogo1Two months after Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner began talking about new programs to help holders of federally insured mortgages who have lost all their equity in the housing bust and are now under water, rules for the new programs are finally starting to appear. But like most of the other federal homeowner initiatives described to date, early details suggest the Making Home Affordable Program will be of little practical help to those with low-to-negative equity and less-then-perfect credit scores.

The new programs for mortgage refinancing and modification sound ideal on paper, often requiring no mortgage insurance and allowing loan-to-value ratios as high as 105 percent and requiring no specific credit rating at all as long as homeowners have remained current to date on their mortgage payments. But the devil is in the details and looking into the conforming rate sheets just published by major lenders we see new risk-based pricing adjustments (generally called “loan level pricing adjustments” in the mortgage industry) that can add up to four basis points to the mortgage principal for homeowners with LTV’s above 95 percent and credit scores below 620 – the very heart of the homeowner group in the greatest trouble.

While the government claims the programs can help 7-9 million homeowners, that doesn’t seem likely under the current rules.

On top of other pricing adjustments for property type and loan amount these new programs can add thousands to the loan balances of homeowners with low equity and less-than-perfect credit, with the increased costs often enough to price many homeowners out of the programs entirely.

A homeowner trying to refinance a loan with a 100 percent LTV and poor credit, for example, might easily see the required risk-based points take that loan beyond the 105 percent LTV limit. While it is possible to take the points from savings or investments rather than roll them into the loan, most homeowners in this group don’t have such savings or investments available.

While the new programs are good for homeowners with credit ratings above 680 and LTVs in the 80s or lower, this does not describe most of today’s conforming mortgage holders who truly need a refi or modification.

cringely Blog , , , , , ,

Jumbos Are Back, But Buyers Aren’t Biting

April 13th, 2009

Jumbo mortgages, those in excess of $417,000 or $729,000 depending on the market, practically disappeared with the burst of the housing bubble, but now they are coming back with major lenders like Bank of America and ING putting some real effort into the segment. But that doesn’t mean people are actually buying homes that require jumbo mortgages, according to lenders. There is a jumbo REFI boom of sorts, but nobody seems to be buying big houses that aren’t short sales or foreclosures.

Jumbo mortgages have stringent requirements, including hefty down payments. Buyers are still waiting to see if the real estate market has bottomed out, and few people these days want to commit to a big down payment if it means selling securities that are already down..

Rates for 30-year fixed-rate jumbo mortgages have dropped from an average of 7.28 percent a year ago to 6.44 percent last week, the lowest since April 2007, according to HSH Associates, which tracks consumer loan information. Rates for smaller 30-year mortgages were averaging 4.97 percent last week.

Jumbo mortgages are those too large to be backed by the federal government through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Mortgages that are under those limits — $417,000 or $729,000 depending n the market — are so-called “conforming” loans.

Jumbo rates are also higher because the secondary market — where mortgages are sold to generate new funds — has dried up. Now, lenders need to keep loans on their own books, assuming the risk themselves.

Keith Gumbinger of HSH, which is based in New Jersey, said the difference between conforming and jumbo mortgage rates used to run around one-fourth of a percentage point, or 25 basis points. “So if a conforming rate was 5 percent, a jumbo would be around 5¼. Right now, that gap is extraordinarily wide. Last week, it was exactly 150 basis points.”

The Federal Reserve’s influence to lower conforming mortgage rates has produced the larger gap, he said. “The gap remains extraordinarily wide, not because jumbos aren’t doing their part. They are. But because other prices have been artificially influenced lower.”

He advised anyone looking for a mortgage or to refinance to shop around more than ever. “Some lenders are in a better position to make you a competitive loan than others. You’ve got to go out and scour around your marketplace. Shop it effectively.”

Some large lenders, including Bank of America, are starting to promote jumbo rates below 6 percent.

In time the combination of falling home prices and lower mortgage rates will improve the affordability of higher-end properties and sales will start to rise. The concern about waiting for the bottom is the only way you know you’ve hit bottom is when it is on the way up.

cringely Lender Updates, News , , , , , ,

Refi Applications Up Again on Even Lower Rates

April 2nd, 2009

Refinancing applications continue at a torrid pace, up another 3.7 percent last week driven by even lower rates, according to the Mortgage Bankers’s ssociation, while new home mortgages remain almost nonexistent.

Loan rates hit a new low last week, the MBA said, although the decline from the previous week was slight: The average contract rate for 30-year loans dipped to 4.61% percent from 4.63 percent. The 30-year loan rate has tumbled from 5.07 percent in early January as the Federal Reserve has ramped up its efforts to push down mortgage costs by buying mortgage-backed securities in the open market.

Although refis have soared, the MBA index that measures loan applications for home purchases has risen only modestly in recent weeks, despite the plunge in loan rates. The purchase-loan index edged up less than 0.1 percent last week and is up just 14% since reaching an eight-year low the week of February 6, even though home affordability, as measured by a National Association of Realtors index, is at its highest level since the group created the index in 1981.

cringely Lender Updates, News , , ,

The Samurai Solution

January 29th, 2009
Comments Off

samurai2The Obama Administration, only days old, is already in a terrible bind.  For all the talk of fiscal stimulus, there is a very good chance that spending a quick $1 trillion or so on public works, tax reductions, and buying back bad loans simply isn’t going to do enough to foreshorten what is already a nasty recession.  Some economists like Paul Krugman of the New York Times and Princeton University say the answer is simply to spend more money.  If $1 trillion won’t do it, then try $2 trillion.

But there is another solution starting to bubble-up from the mortgage industry, itself.  It’s a bit of lateral thinking that wouldn’t generally come to the mind of an academic like Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, but just might offer a cheaper and easier way out of this mess – a way inspired by the Japanese.  The Japanese of 1600 that is.

The problem faced by the Obama Administration is that this is, at heart, a housing crisis, yet most of the solutions tried so far have little direct effect on housing.  We can use tax dollars to recapitalize the banks, but that doesn’t seem to result in more mortgages being issued, for example.  There are simply too many houses available in the U.S. and WAY too many of those are worth less than their owners paid to either buy or build them.  At least 10 million U.S. homeowners are effectively under water and therefore unable to refinance.  Their options are to pay outrageous mortgage payments as their adjustable rate loans get more and more expensive, or to simply walk away from their homes, taking with them their problems yet leaving their empty houses as a further drag on the U.S. economy.

The White House has no new ideas for handling this crisis, or appears not to.  Congress is equally stymied.  The Treasury Department and Federal Reserve have used all the tools at their disposal and invented a few more, too, with little effect.  What we need is a miracle.

So did Japan just before 1600.  The country was in turmoil and had been for more than 100 years thanks to the introduction of western firearms in 1477.  The B-movie culture of Samurai swordsmen had given way to armies of peasant soldiers with guns doing as they were told to do by officers who generally came from what was left of the Samurai class.  Japan had lost culture, identity, power in the world, and had especially lost a hell of a lot of Samurai as they found it far more efficient to blow each other up in groups than to die one at a time in sword battles.

All the traditional Japanese feudal classes were threatened.  Something had to be done.  So Japan gave up firearms.  After more than 120 years of shooting-off body parts, Japan under the rule of daimo Toyotomi Hideoshi after 1600 successfully repudiated firearms and went back to the old way of Samurai swords-for-hire hacking each other to bits in service of their feudal lords.

This idea of deliberately turning away from technology is foreign to western thinking, yet we seem poised to do something very similar to end the mortgage crisis – repudiating a specific technology that stands in the way of a quick and soft landing for the economy.  Suddenly there is talk in mortgage circles of selectively giving up under certain highly specific conditions that stalwart weapon of home financing, the real estate appraisal.

There are millions of homes in the United States that are worth less than is owed on them.  The Fed and Treasury are thinking-up ever more expensive ways of dealing with this problem – everything from buying-up sub-prime mortgages and holding them to maturity to buying up sub-prime homes, paying-off their mortgages, then simply tearing them down to reduce supply and help prices to firm.  And the bogeyman most directly faced by politicians attempting to address the housing crisis is  that houses under water can’t, by definition, be refinanced.  The problem is lack of equity in light of  FHA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac rules that require a down payment that varies from five to 20 percent for replacement mortgages and refis.

And yet, in the bad old days of just over a year or so ago there were mortgage brokers selling all day long no-doc loans that required no money down to borrow up to 125 percent of a home’s value.  Why can’t we do that today?

We can’t because the rules have changed – tightened – and it is harder to qualify for a loan.  Yet to hear the Administration talk about it, this is just the time when it would help a lot if more people – not less – could qualify for a mortgage.  People would buy houses, which means other people could sell houses and eventually prices would stabilize and even start to rise, leading the banks out of their current wilderness in the process.

The solution to this problem is simple and actually doesn’t require more money or even an act of Congress:  just stop requiring an appraisal for FHA, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac qualifying refinance loans.  Let the actual value of the house or property float.

For new loans on new property, yes, an appraisal would still be required.  But for refinance loans on existing owner-occupied properties with no cash out, appraisals would not be required.  Rather than assign a home value lenders would simply use the previous loan balance.  The new loans could be fixed-rate, rather than adjustable, and at current interest rates payments would be lower.  If they weren’t enough lower, the lenders could still use painless (to them) mortgage management tools like 40-year terms and zero-interest introductory periods.  Few houses would be lost to foreclosure, less capital would be needed by the banks, and because bad loans were being replaced with better ones, the associated toxic derivative securities would be pulled from circulation.

This solution separates – as Wall Street has already done in effect through the use of derivative securities – the house from the loan.  It isn’t the house that is toxic, it is the loan.  Interest rates are down and millions of homeowners – and society as a whole – would be well served if these loans could be refinanced to reflect those lower rates, making the houses in turn more affordable.  The method for doing this is to forgo appraisals and simply refinance the mortgage, not the house.

It’s don’t ask, don’t tell — a convenient ruse that lets us fix what needs to be fixed without too much introspection or analysis.

This isn’t such a radical suggestion.  Many mortgages are already granted without appraisals for properties where large down payments and historical pricing precedents make appraisals just an added expense that lenders sometimes prefer to give up.

Not requiring an appraisal effectively raises the limits on how little equity a homeowner can retain in the property while still claiming to own it – in this case probably allowing financing of up to 109 percent of the market value by recent estimates.  But we won’t officially know that because there is no appraisal.

By simply changing the rules in this manner millions of foreclosures can be avoided, families can avoid disruption, the economy can start to heal quicker, billions can be saved, and nobody has to know better.

It’s the Samurai way.

cringely Blog , , , , ,